<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Wonder Where is Nuffnang&#8217;s innit Heading to? Is It Your Loss to Be Out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/</link>
	<description>Money &#124; Scandals &#124; Gossips &#124; Fun &#124; Celebrities &#124; IT &#124; Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasostannalinly</title>
		<link>http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/comment-page-1/#comment-3185</link>
		<dc:creator>jasostannalinly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/#comment-3185</guid>
		<description>wow :-) 
its very interesting point of view. 
Good post. 
realy gj 
 
thank you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow <img src='http://www.jialat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
its very interesting point of view.<br />
Good post.<br />
realy gj </p>
<p>thank you <img src='http://www.jialat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faye</title>
		<link>http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Faye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Good post. I have read about Nuffnang telling bloggers they need to pay them first without getting paid from advertisers. From the way they said, it sounded like they are traumatised by this. I just wanted to say, in every business it is the same. You have your starting cost. The man selling noodles has to pay for his noodles before he can sell it to you. The man selling shoes needs to buy shoes and rent a space before he can sell shoes to you. Its all part of the running cost. I dont understand why are they so particularly feeling themselves doing one big helluva favour to bloggers. For me, it is just normal since they decide how bloggers get paid and whence to get paid, so why come out and bitch about it? Ultimately Nuffnang were in control and since you guys are in control, you design your system within your means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I have read about Nuffnang telling bloggers they need to pay them first without getting paid from advertisers. From the way they said, it sounded like they are traumatised by this. I just wanted to say, in every business it is the same. You have your starting cost. The man selling noodles has to pay for his noodles before he can sell it to you. The man selling shoes needs to buy shoes and rent a space before he can sell shoes to you. Its all part of the running cost. I dont understand why are they so particularly feeling themselves doing one big helluva favour to bloggers. For me, it is just normal since they decide how bloggers get paid and whence to get paid, so why come out and bitch about it? Ultimately Nuffnang were in control and since you guys are in control, you design your system within your means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steward</title>
		<link>http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Steward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>To be a great company, it&#039;s absolute paramount that the people running it show their class.

Josh Lim had great support in the community and Paddy Tan too ever since they started. There is a certain standard they had observed.

What happened with Nuffnang in recent months are bad piece of business on their part, no doubt about that. That sort of thing upset their reputation. They should do all possible and allow their reputation to grow, instead they&#039;re doing the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be a great company, it&#8217;s absolute paramount that the people running it show their class.</p>
<p>Josh Lim had great support in the community and Paddy Tan too ever since they started. There is a certain standard they had observed.</p>
<p>What happened with Nuffnang in recent months are bad piece of business on their part, no doubt about that. That sort of thing upset their reputation. They should do all possible and allow their reputation to grow, instead they&#8217;re doing the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jialat.com/2008/01/23/i-wonder-where-is-nuffnangs-innit-heading-to-is-it-your-loss-to-be-out/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re quite right with your analysis. Exclusivity is not mean exclusive just because you termed it.

Exclusive but in what way? What are golds and diamonds if they have no values? They would be just like pebbles and stones.

One thing they did not put a consideration on is that they need the support of blogging community more than anything else. More than the blogging community need them. From the way they handled the community whom  are so called their partnership, we can tell their agenda. And they are behaving a wee unmistakenly arrogant.

Its a bit of the egg and chicken situation. You need more chicken, so you can have more eggs. And you need more eggs too, then you can have more chickens. By hanging a &quot;EXCLUSIVE&quot; sign, they&#039;re just cutting out on the supply of the eggs or chickens. What are the consequences? You get lesser chickens or lesser eggs.

This is not a smart move, i don&#039;t know who came up with that but if you wanted to call something exclusivity and you&#039;re sincere about it, then there is no more genuine than to come up with something really exclusive.

The exclusivity that we&#039;re seeing now is no more than what normal nuffnangers had been offered for as long as we can remember. So my point is, there are no exclusivity, only a declivity as i see it. And that is what they do to bloggers who had given them the chance to succeed. We have seen them thanking bloggers and advertisers all over the  blogospheres. Are they genuine? Did they walk their talk? You are not stupid. You can decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re quite right with your analysis. Exclusivity is not mean exclusive just because you termed it.</p>
<p>Exclusive but in what way? What are golds and diamonds if they have no values? They would be just like pebbles and stones.</p>
<p>One thing they did not put a consideration on is that they need the support of blogging community more than anything else. More than the blogging community need them. From the way they handled the community whom  are so called their partnership, we can tell their agenda. And they are behaving a wee unmistakenly arrogant.</p>
<p>Its a bit of the egg and chicken situation. You need more chicken, so you can have more eggs. And you need more eggs too, then you can have more chickens. By hanging a &#8220;EXCLUSIVE&#8221; sign, they&#8217;re just cutting out on the supply of the eggs or chickens. What are the consequences? You get lesser chickens or lesser eggs.</p>
<p>This is not a smart move, i don&#8217;t know who came up with that but if you wanted to call something exclusivity and you&#8217;re sincere about it, then there is no more genuine than to come up with something really exclusive.</p>
<p>The exclusivity that we&#8217;re seeing now is no more than what normal nuffnangers had been offered for as long as we can remember. So my point is, there are no exclusivity, only a declivity as i see it. And that is what they do to bloggers who had given them the chance to succeed. We have seen them thanking bloggers and advertisers all over the  blogospheres. Are they genuine? Did they walk their talk? You are not stupid. You can decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

