Insider Story Of “Sun Tan”?
I am surprised, very very surprised. I never expect my “Sun Tan” post will bring me so much traffics. Jialat dotCom got more than 4100 visitors on 25th (the afternoon that I posted the “Sun Tan” entry), and more than 5100 visitors on 26th. The last time Jialat dotCom got more than 4000 visitors a day was when the “Sex In McDonald Uniform Saga” published by that local English tabloid (I didn’t include the Edison Chen period, that was MAD!), which is exactly 5 months back. After some further checking, I found many of the visitors came from Sammyboy Forum, because someone saw my “Sun Tan” entry and posted over there. Also,, someone posted a link in SG Forum, so there were quite a fair bit of visitors from there as well.
I went to take a look at the thread in Sammyboy Forum, and I found some juicy “insider story”! In that thread, someone replied the thread starter saying that he was the readers of Sun Tan’s sex blog with her boyfriend, but after while, the couple started collecting fees. Means that, readers had to pay subscription fees to them.
After reply, another forummer replied with the following:
ok let me get this straight, girl post her own sex pics and videos on her blog for the whole wide world to see, then decided that since so many ppl are viewing, hey why not monetize! then realised others can view her pics and videos from another source without paying a cent, girl got mad and made police report and threaten to sue(hoping to claim lost of income?) just because she lost the source to monetize? gimme a break. she’s fugly btw, back view make me steam, see her face only, CMI!
Hmmmm, this sounds interesting right? Anyway, I am not sure how true it is, but sounds rather logical on the “lodging police report” part. However, it still doesn’t explain, who is the first one, the Hotel69, sending all the videos, photos to our source blog and what’s his purpose? But anyway, sure this is interesting enough.
Sad that everything about Sun Tan has been leaked here too: http://…/msg2046/#msg2046
Edited: too bad I have edited your msg.